All things AI agents and ML algorithms.

LLMs in 2025: Next-Level AI or More of the Same?

Andrei Oprisan
Andrei Oprisan

A lot changed in the LLM landscape last year. After the barriers around GPT-4 fell in 2024 and new multimodal, reasoning-focused models emerged, entire new categories of use-cases took shape. We witnessed LLM prices plummet, saw the incredible promise of locally run GPT-4–class models, and marveled at both the wonders and worries of the great AI datacenter buildout. As we roll into 2025, here’s a direct, matter-of-fact look at the big trends—plus a few predictions for what happens next.

1. GPT-4 Is No Longer a Ceiling—It’s Table Stakes

Twelve months ago, surpassing GPT-4 was the prestige milestone in AI. Now, dozens of organizations offer models that meet or beat GPT-4’s capabilities. The "GPT-4 barrier" came down so thoroughly that "beating GPT-4" no longer even makes headlines—models at that performance level are basically a standard requirement for staying relevant.

2025 Prediction: We’ll see smaller AI labs cross the GPT-4 threshold more frequently, sometimes in breathtakingly short training cycles. GPT-4-level performance will be the new default in enterprise AI offerings.

2. GPT-4–Class Models on Laptops: Not a Gimmick

Last year’s biggest surprise was the realization that top-tier models can actually run on prosumer hardware with 64GB of RAM. We now know it’s possible to run them—albeit slowly—on a MacBook or even a powerful smartphone. Behind this are huge leaps in model efficiency and creative model compression techniques.

2025 Prediction: Locally run large models will blossom in niche consumer electronics and "offline-first" enterprise solutions. Expect Apple’s MLX library and other hardware-optimized frameworks to make big waves here.

3. Prices Crashed, Efficiency Soared

The cost per million tokens dropped from the double or triple digits down to pennies for many providers. For users, this means the "metered dread" from the early days of GPT-4 is mostly over. For the environment—at least in terms of per-prompt energy—it’s a relief, because higher efficiency means less waste.

2025 Prediction: Price wars continue, but the real win is the corresponding slash in energy consumption per inference. That said, expect a continued arms race in datacenter construction—whether all that capacity gets used is a different question.

4. Multimodal Is Normal—Voice and Video Are the Next Frontier

Almost every major LLM provider now offers vision-based inputs; audio support is ramping up, and live video feed is emerging. Real-time "camera mode" that can interpret the scene in front of you is no longer science fiction. Voice interactions, no longer merely STT/TTS hacks, are increasingly "true" multimodal models.

2025 Prediction: The real story of 2025 is the "augmented reality" of conversation—live LLM overlays on your camera feed. A flurry of new AR devices will hinge on these real-time capabilities. People who aren’t comfortable talking to their devices yet may find themselves a minority very soon.

5. Prompt-Driven App Generation Is a Commodity

The ability to say "build me a to-do list web app" and have an LLM produce working code was once novel; now it’s table stakes. Anthropic Claude Artifacts kicked off a wave of "prompt to UI" features embedded in everything from GitHub to small startup tools.

2025 Prediction: Everyone from Notion to small data-viz vendors will incorporate "generate an interactive widget" tools. This is the "low-code" movement on steroids. The real skill gap: learning how to refine prompts so that these one-click apps do exactly what you want—safely.

6. Universal Access to Top Models: A Brief Golden Age

We all remember that strange, wonderful window last year when GPT-4–level models from OpenAI and Anthropic were freely available. That ended once providers realized that more compute is required for better inference, and that "premium" solutions need higher price tags.

2025 Prediction: The era of unlimited free access to top-tier models is gone for good, replaced by either subscription paywalls or heavily metered usage. Public libraries and academic institutions might step into the gap with their own open-source or subsidized projects.

7. "Agents" Still Aren’t a Thing (Depending on What You Mean)

People have been buzzing about autonomous "agents" since at least 2022. The hype oversold them—LLMs still don’t reliably distinguish truth from fiction, so trusting them with decisions is risky. Tool-using LLM frameworks exist, but real autonomy remains elusive.

2025 Prediction: Unless "agents" can handle gullibility and prompt injection, they’re basically advanced macros. We’ll see more tool-based LLM solutions in CRM and project management, but the dream of a fully "autonomous AI assistant" is still on ice.

8. Evals Are the Key to Building Good LLM Products

We now know that the best path to robust system prompts is to define rigorous tests first. "Test-driven prompt engineering" has become an industry standard for companies that want reliable LLM outputs.

2025 Prediction: An arms race in "eval frameworks" will emerge. Tools that automate prompt tests and measure "reasoning token" usage under different scenarios will proliferate, especially among larger enterprises that want consistent quality.

9. Apple Intelligence Disappoints, but MLX Library Shines

Apple rolled out "Apple Intelligence" last year, with underwhelming results. Meanwhile, their MLX library for local inference on Macs is a triumph—making Apple hardware the go-to device for personal offline LLMs.

2025 Prediction: Apple doubles down on "privacy-first" but keeps the best LLM capabilities walled off for fear of brand damage from hallucinations. Third-party devs, ironically, may lead the real Apple Silicon revolution.

10. "Inference-Scaling" or "Reasoning" Models Usher in a New Era

OpenAI’s o1 and follow-up o3 (and Google’s gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp) introduced a concept: let the model "think" in hidden tokens, spending more compute to solve tougher problems. It’s a radical shift from simply piling on parameters.

2025 Prediction: Everyone will release versions of these inference-scaled models. They’ll offer adjustable "reasoning budgets" so you can pay more for complex tasks. This might be the new frontier, overshadowing raw model size.

11. China’s LLM Labs Are Closing the Gap

DeepSeek v3 and Qwen’s new models show that massive-scale training can be done cheaply and efficiently in China. That’s forcing the rest of the world to scramble for hardware—and to reconsider which "big labs" are truly in the lead.

2025 Prediction: U.S. export restrictions on high-end GPUs will further motivate Chinese labs to innovate in training efficiency. Expect more open releases with surprisingly low budgets but world-class performance.

12. The Environment: It’s Both Better and Worse

Per-inference energy costs and training footprints are shrinking; that’s the "good" news. The "bad" news is the staggering expansions in GPU-filled datacenters—some of which will never be fully used. The carbon impact of infrastructure build-outs is not trivial.

2025 Prediction: Providers tout energy efficiency gains for PR points, but the real story is entire new data hubs worldwide. Expect stricter regulatory scrutiny on big tech’s resource usage.

13. The Year of "Slop" Spawned a Backlash

The term "slop" stuck: it’s become shorthand for unreviewed, unrequested AI junk. Flooding the internet with AI spam was inevitable, but pushback was fierce.

2025 Prediction: Social platforms and search engines race to filter out "slop." Meanwhile, specialized "curated human content" networks start touting real-human label guarantees, selling authenticity as a premium feature.

14. Synthetic Training Data Is Mainstream—and Effective

Fears about "model collapse" from training on AI-generated data haven’t materialized. Instead, labs use synthetic examples to fill knowledge gaps or refine model reasoning skills. In fact, "model on model" data generation has become a competitive strategy.

2025 Prediction: We’ll see entire synthetic corpora curated by large organizations, used to train or fine-tune specialized LLMs in medicine, law, or engineering. The line between "organic" and "synthetic" data will blur more than ever.

15. LLMs Got Harder to Use—And That Gap Is Widening

These models have soared in power, but so have their complexity and pitfalls. Knowing which model can do what, and how to prompt it properly, is now a specialized skill. Many new users have inaccurate mental models of LLM capabilities, and prompt injection remains an evergreen threat.

2025 Prediction: We’ll get better guardrails, documentation, and tutorials. But the real leaps will come from integrated "explainers" that show precisely how the LLM arrived at an answer—making it a little less magical and a bit more transparent to everyday users.

Final Word: We Need Smarter Adoption, Not Blind Hype

LLMs are at once unreliable, unbelievably capable, environmentally contentious, cheaper than ever, and occasionally breathtaking to use—depending on who’s using them and how. The biggest challenge in 2025 isn’t building the next great model (that’s happening anyway). It’s about teaching people to separate the real utility from the noise, so that the technology’s undeniable strengths aren’t lost beneath an ocean of "slop" and short-sighted hype. If 2024 was the year LLMs got bigger, faster, cheaper, and more complex all at the same time, 2025 might be the year we learn to use them responsibly—or risk drowning in our own illusions of what they can and can’t do.